My goal is to standardize my files so that in Foobar2000 no files display data in an ARTISTSORTORDER column, and all files diaplay an ARTISTSORT value. I have not manually mapped these fields using "User-defined field mappings". When I subsequently open the file in MP3Tag and inspect it via "Extended Tags", I see the following:įrom what I can tell, MP3Tag is doing some kind of mapping to display any ARTISTSORTORDER value as ARTISTSORT. In Foobar2000, I can manually add an ARTISTSORT field to File "A" and populate it with "Redding, Otis TESTING", and the file shows the following in Foobar2000's "Properties | Metadata" dialog box: I have another mp3 that I created by ripping a CD to FLAC using the Linux Sound Juicer, and then converting the resulting FLAC file to MP3 in Foobar2000.įor File "B", everything works as I expect for the MP3 file.Foobar and MP3Tag both use ARTISTSORT, and I don't have the problem I have with file "A". ![]() In MP3Tag, if I right-click on File "A" and choose "Properties | Tag" I see the following: I do not see an ARTISTSORTORDER field in MP3tag, as I do in Foobar2000-that data is now displaying instead in ARTISTSORT. In MP3Tag, if I load File "A" (the MP3) and right-click and choose "Extended Tags", I see the following: The Artist Sort value "Redding, Otis" only displays in the %artistsortorder% column, as I would expect from looking at the metadata through the "Properties" dialog box. In Foobar2000, I have separate columns (for testing purposes) that display %artistsort% and %artistsortorder%. In Foobar2000, if I choose "Properties | Details", I see: In Foobar2000, if I right-click on "File A" (the MP3) and choose "Properties | Metadata", I see the following: I did not create the original FLAC, and I'm not sure what software was used to do so. ![]() I have an MP3 file that comes from my conversion of a FLAC file (in Foobar2000). ![]() I've been trying to figure out the following issue for several days reading this forum and others.ĭoes MP3Tag have "hard-coded" mapping (as opposed to the "User-defined field mappings" seen at "Tools | Options | Tags | Mapping") that would force data stored in a field encoded as ARTISTSORTORDER to display in MP3Tag in a column whose value is supposed to be ARTISTSORT? Is there a way to re-write or transform the field in MP3Tag rather than just have MP3Tag temporary display the field with a mapped label?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |